Case Studies
Case Study - The Effect of Malar AugmentationCase Study - The Effect of Malar Augmentation
In the case study below, both patient and surgeon reported a good satisfactory outcome directly post-operatively and at the six-month follow-up.
![]() |
The orange area is the mismatch when compared to the contralateral side. The surgeon marked in black the extent that he wanted to repair. The white contour is the final implant that was made. |
![]() |
This is a colour-difference map showing the change in contour, i.e. an augmentation of 1mm to 3mm across the region of interest. |
Case Study - Illustration of the Importance of a Customised Repair
These show the post-operative aspect of the patient's soft tissue following a non-customised repair (in this case, using standard mesh). The patient then needs a second operation to rectify this.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cavendish Implants swift service provides the customised implant within 4 days. This is so that the surgeon can order the implant for primary surgery. The implant gives the patient a correct contour and is a permanent repair.
Case Study - Specific Implant
We present here a young female patient with neurofibroma who had previous eye and skull surgery. The eye socket needed to be reconstructed with a concave shape to allow an eye prosthesis to be fitted. Furthermore the temporalis area had been extensively eroded by the tumour. Due to the very likely regrowth of the tumour, surgeons wanted a strong impervious barrier to preserve the outer contours of the patient's skin and eye socket.![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Study - The importance of orbital curvatures
The orbital floor and wall curvatures define the position of the orbit in terms of both functionality and aesthetics. The implant reconstructing these curvatures must therefore have the correct curvatures to provide a satisfactory repair. We present below what we see on a regular basis: a patient whose ineffective orbital repair needed revision with a customised implant to achieve the correct result.
![]() |
This CT scan reconstruction shows the shape of the primary repair: it is cylindrical as opposed to achieving the anterior-posterior S-shape raising and supporting the eye ball higher up in the orbit. | ![]() |
It was a difficult task to remove the original repair (left). It was then replaced by the customised repair (right) which will 1) hold its shape while being inserted, 2) be inserted through a minimally invasive incision, and 3) achieve the correct contour to restore the correct anatomical position of the eye ball. |
![]() |
The location of the incision to insert the customised implant is usually just above or just under the eye lash line. The implant is then securely attached to the orbital rim. Please note that the incision is usually smaller than shown on this photo (here necessary to gain access to and extract the original repair). |
Case Study - Temporalis Suspension
The temporalis suspension feature has been on our cranioplasty implants since 2008.![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Study - "Two-in-One" operation with prefabricated implant
Bone tumours are a particular example of cases where it is often possible to perform two procedures in one: 1) the removal of the tumour, and 2) the insertion of our implant to restore the skull protection and contour. We consult with the surgeon to define the planned extent of the resection on the CT scan. The implant is then designed to extend onto the remaining bone for secure attachment. If there is any uncertainty in the likely extent of resection, one option is to err on the side of caution and make the plate extend further. If some bone is found to be healthy, it can remain as the plate will fit over the top of it.
© Cavendish Implants 2009